Peer Evaluation
Description
|
Tick / (Y/N) | Peer Evaluation |
| Overall design of the blog with regard to appeal, design and titles |
Y
|
The design could be more colorful and bright, but it’s al right. The design and titles are big, and it’s mostly dark colors, and the font is especially appealing. |
| Posts are easily identifiable |
Y
|
Yes, the fonts for each subtitle for the posts are easily identifiable and easy to find. |
| Reflections after each criterion (not less than 200-250 words) | Yes, one of her paragraphs is 350 words. I read most of her reflections and am sure they are more than 250. | |
| Criterion A-Inquiry and Analysis Has all the inquiry questions with regard to Design situation answered |
Y
|
She has successfully met the criteria, and has all the questions in criteria A answered with a justification and clearly explained what she had done. |
| Criterion B-Developing Ideas The drawings are uploaded with reflection on the chosen design |
Yes, she had efficiently drawn pictures with annotations, though she could have added more details to her annotations. | |
| Criterion C-Creating the solution on Scratch, Peer Evaluation & reflection done | No, she has not yet done the peer reflection for me. |
Checklist for Peer Evaluation Whose Blog did you evaluate? Sneha
Name of the Student who peer evaluated: Aamnah
How could your friend improve his/her blog?
She could improve it by adding more detail for her annotations on her design and developing ideas.
What did you like most about the blog?
I like her theme for her blog as well as her ideas, and how she created the ideas on scratch.
Date Evaluated: 12 /12/2015
Design Idea Specification
|
Met/Not Met |
| Background |
Met
|
| Sprite used |
Met
|
| Music |
Met
|
| Speech |
Met
|
| Colour |
Met
|
| Action Taking place |
Met
|
| Sense of appeal |
Met
|
| Sense of appeal |
Met
|
Self Evaluation
I think that I could have done many thing to improve my blog. I didn't quite understand in the beginning what we had to do and what the assignment was about. The beginning criteria A wasn't that hard for me but the part where we had to state the things we had to state the opportunities and weakness thing again started to get jumbled up. At first I didn't realise we had to make a starch program for our criteria C. In the examples miss gave us the person had made a blog based on the design situation so that is were I went wrong in the criteria A. I my swot analysis I had to add my scratch strengths and weaknesses. That is something I didn't do properly and had to change after quite a while.
For criteria B I wasn't able to do my design specification for quite some time as I had injured my hand and wasn't able to draw. Later on I had to settle for doing the design specification on the computer. I was able to do the drawing part but I wasn't able to annotate it properly. I think that is were I lacked the most. I could have done a lot to improve in that criteria. As for criteria C, most of it was fine but I can improve it by adding instructions. This is for the program the person who is running the program has to type if they prefer to type or talk and if they were running the program the first time they didn't quite understand what they had to do. Overall I had many ups and downs but I did lean quite a few thing about scratch and my design situation.
